In the aftermath of the September 11th attacks, President George W. Bush signed the USA Patriot Act into law, and gave the government unprecedented surveillance powers both at home and abroad. Proponents argue the state has a duty to protect its citizens, and given the threat of terrorist activity on U.S. soil, must employ all resources available to keep the Americans safe. But does the threat of attack warrant intrusion of Americans’ right to privacy? And do efforts to expand government powers violate the Constitution?
Bob Barr0 Items
- The 21st Century Liberties Chair for Freedom and Privacy at the American Conservative Union, and Board Member of the National Rifle Association
Jeffrey Rosen0 Items
- Professor of Law at the George Washington University Law School and the Legal Affairs Editor of the New Republic
Nadine Strossen4 Items
More from Nadine Strossen
- Fmr President, ACLU & Professor, New York Law School