User login

Join The Debate

Cast your vote and join the conversation.

Membership is free.

Get Started

You are here

Gail Heriot

Gail Heriot

Professor of Law, USD School of Law & Member, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights

Gail Heriot is a professor of law at the University of San Diego and a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Prior to entering academia, she practiced law with Mayer, Brown & Platt in Chicago and Hogan & Hartson in Washington, D.C. She also served as civil rights counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary and clerked for the Honorable Seymour F. Simon of the Illinois Supreme Court. A former editor of the University of Chicago Law Review, Herriot has been published in the Michigan Law Review, the Virginia Law Review, and the Harvard Journal on Legislation, as well as The Wall Street Journal, National Review, Los Angeles Times and The San Diego Union Tribune. She is the editor and an author of a forthcoming anthology of essays entitled, California Dreaming: Race, Gender, Proposition 209 and the Principle of Non-Discrimination.

More About Gail Heriot

We now have fewer African-American physicians, scientists, and engineers than we would have had using race-neutral admissions policies. We have fewer college professors and lawyers, too. Put more bluntly, affirmative action has backfired.

Wednesday, December 31, 1969

Before the <em>Grutter</em> case, constitutional experts thought that the days of race preferential admissions policies were numbered… The Supreme Court had never really approved this kind of discrimination.

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

As well-meaning as affirmative action policies were originally, they’ve backfired badly, and, at some point, colleges and universities and the courts are going to have to come to terms with that. (Heriot begins at 10:00.)

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Race-preferential admissions were intended to facilitate the entry of minorities into higher education and eventually into high-prestige careers. There is considerable evidence, however, that they have the opposite effect. Affirmative action thus works to the detriment of its supposed beneficiaries, who are seldom informed of this risk.

Wednesday, December 31, 1969

The assumption behind the fierce competition for admission to elite colleges and universities is clear: The more elite the school one attends, the brighter one’s future. That assumption, however, may well be flawed.

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Even the most optimistic view of the data shows that racial preferences in law school admissions come at a heavy cost—a cost that disproportionately falls upon African Americans.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008