Kori Schake is the deputy director-general of the International Institute for Strategic Studies and was previously a research fellow at the Hoover Institution. Schake is the editor, with Jim Mattis, of “Warriors and Citizens: American Views of Our Military” and author of “Safe Passage: The Transition from British to American Hegemony.” She was the director for defense strategy and requirements on the National Security Council under George W. Bush, where she helped create NATO’s Allied Command Transformation and the NATO Response Force.
More About Kori Schake
The current international order provides an opportunity for U.S. policymakers to put the defense budget in order, and the long- term federal budget outlook makes seizing this opportunity essential.
It's hard not to despair about the irresponsibility of politicians in Congress, the White House, and the Pentagon (suited and uniformed) watching the FY2014 budget process unfold.
The odds are slim that Hagel will become a strong and capable secretary. In order to boost the odds of his success, he quickly needs to send signals throughout the organization that he can command respect.
Discussion of budget proposals by co-authors Admiral Gary Roughhead and Kori Schake (misspelled in transcript) and Cindy Williams.
Can the new president really shake things up as much as we fear?
There’s a delicious irony in the Trump team’s affection for the historian—who repeatedly shows how populists lead societies to ruin.
The False Logic of Retreat.
When it comes to America’s engagement with the outside world — from trade to alliances — there’s still broad agreement across parties.
“Obama seems to believe that the lesson of Iraq and Libya is to never intervene, rather than to learn how to intervene better, as the United States did in northern Iraq after the Gulf War, in the Balkan wars in the 1990s, and in Colombia’s struggle against insurgents during the past two decades.”
“Our failures are not the result of intervening in the wrong places.”
“Though westerners are understandably wary of war, the US has high stakes in Syria and limited intervention can go far.”
“An intervention that seeks to create refugee camps within Syrian territory would take the pressure off neighboring countries. The United Nations estimates that six million Syrians are in need of urgent assistance, a full third of the population.”
“And I think actually after leaving Iraq and our halfhearted efforts in Afghanistan, we are actually going to need to put troops on the ground in order for other people to be willing to put troops on the ground.”
Almost halfway through a discussion on Iraq, Kori Schake discusses what she believes the U.S. should do there, and supports the idea that the U.S. has a strategy of promoting, inter alia, human rights.
While others on the panel advocate for a grand policy of nonintervention, Kori Schake advocates for a case-by-case intervention policy.
“[Kori] Schake joins Stephanie Ruhle along with her panel to discuss Trump on the world stage.”
Scholars Kori Schake and Robin Wright discuss the Iran nuclear agreement and ISIS strategy at the 2017 Aspen Security Forum.
Kori Schake argues, “The nuclear deal takes a potential Iranian nuclear weapon out of the equation for another eight years or more, buying us valuable time to push back on such behavior by Iran—and that is the material advantage of the JPCOA.”
Kori Schake argues, “Republican candidates and Congressmen should give full vent to denouncing the agreement. It will send a note of caution to the Iranian leadership and show allies we take seriously their concerns. And they should all develop crisp answers to the question of what they would do instead.”
Kori Schake names five reasons for supporting the Iran nuclear deal.
Kori Schake argues, “The leader of the free world wants to destroy the alliances, trading relationships and international institutions that have characterized the American-led order for 70 years.”
“Yascha Mounk talks to Kori Schake, deputy director-general of the International Institute for Strategic Studies, about the damage Donald Trump is doing to the trans-Atlantic relationship, what the world would look like without NATO, and why it’s worth defending the liberal international order.”
Kori Schake argues “The Europeans need us, and we need them—let’s not call the whole thing off.”
Dr. Kori Schake discusses “the current transatlantic security landscape, President Trump's upcoming summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, and how the West Coast perceives U.S. relations with European allies.”
Kori Schake argues “The United States isn’t newly worried about being taken advantage of by our NATO allies; that suspicion has worried American governments since NATO’s creation.”
Kori Schake argues, “Whether President Trump is a Manchurian candidate—cultivated for leadership here by an enemy nation to damage our country—or simply feckless is almost irrelevant at this point … Trump’s actions, even if motivated by ill-founded concepts or desperate self-preservation rather than allegiance to a hostile foreign power, are deeply injurious to the welfare of the United States.”
“On the heels of a tension-filled NATO summit, Russia experts wonder whether Trump’s meeting with Putin will address the Russian government’s rising belligerence.”
Kori Schake argues, “We in the West must not be so concerned about Russia’s future bad behavior that we fail to push back against Russia’s current bad behavior. We must not deter ourselves from protecting our interests and our allies.”