Joy Casino Ап Икс Agree to Disagree: Are Identity Politics A Way To Win? - Open to Debate
aviator 1 win1win aviatorpinup indialucky jet crashpin-up4rabet india1 winlucky jet x1win sayti4era betpin up casino onlinemosbetpinuppin up casinoone win gamelucky jetpin up1win1win online1win aposta4rabetmosbet casinoparimatch4rabet bangladeshmostbet aviator loginparimatchmostbet casinopin upmostbet azmostbet aviatorpinupmostbet kz1 win1win slotmostbet casinomostbetpin up 7771 winmosbet indiapin up1win aviatormostbet aviator1 win1win yüklə1 win azaviatorlacky jetmostbet casinolucky jetmosbet aviatormostbet india

Agree to Disagree: Are Identity Politics A Way To Win?

Michael Eric Dyson John McWhorter Identity Politics

The public and pundits alike are still processing the most recent election, but this much we know: 2020 marks the most diverse Congress in American history, and President Trump garnered more minority voters in 2020 than in 2016. As Georgia faces two runoff elections, which will determine which party controls the Senate, gubernatorial nominee Stacey Abrams and other voting-rights advocates have focused on identity politics as a way to prevail in the electoral process. Is it a winning strategy? Two experts on race and identity in America sit with Open to Debate host and moderator John Donvan to debate.

Arguing “YES” is Michael Eric Dyson, an author, New York Times contributing opinion writer, contributing editor of The New Republic, and professor of Sociology at Vanderbilt University.

Arguing “NO” is John McWhorter, an author, host of Lexicon Valley, contributing writer at The Atlantic, and professor of Linguistics at Columbia University.

DEBATE COMMUNITY
Join a community of social and intellectual leaders that truly value the free exchange of ideas.
EDUCATIONAL BRIEFS
Readings on our weekly debates, debater editorials, and news on issues that affect our everyday lives.
SUPPORT OPEN-MINDED DEBATE
Help us bring debate to communities and classrooms across the nation.