User login

Join The Debate

Cast your vote and join the conversation.

Membership is free.


Get Started

Better More Domestic Surveillance Than Another 9/11

The BriefGet Up To Speed

In the aftermath of the September 11th attacks, President George W. Bush signed the USA Patriot Act into law, and gave the government unprecedented surveillance powers both at home and abroad. Proponents argue the state has a duty to protect its citizens, and given the threat of terrorist activity on U.S. soil, must employ all resources available to keep the Americans safe. But does the threat of attack warrant intrusion of Americans’ right to privacy? And do efforts to expand government powers violate the Constitution?

  • Jack Cloonan

    0 Items
    • 25-year Veteran of the FBI and President of Clayton Consultants
    Read Bio
  • John Hutson

    0 Items
    • Retired Rear Admiral, Resident and Dean of Franklin Pierce Law Center
    Read Bio
  • Darius Rejali

    0 Items
    • Professor of Political science and chair of the political science department at Reed College, in Portland, Oregon
    Read Bio