The BriefGet Up To Speed
What might Machiavelli have made of the 44th President of the United States? Barack Obama set out to change the tone of US foreign policy. And he did. By virtue of his personal story, by dint of his not being George W. Bush, he arrived in the White House as both object of fascination and source of relief to a world grown accustomed to resenting the US itself. Here is a president who acknowledges that we hold no monopoly on the legitimacy of our interests, who aspires to finding the common ground in resolving disagreements with friend and foe. His caution, his deliberativeness, his stated willingness to at least try to negotiate even with our bitterest enemies and to cool down the rhetoric ' played so well out of the gate, that they gave him the Nobel Peace Prize ' after just 262 days in office. But is love enough to lead? Or might the president need some wins along the way? For the most part, they've been hard to come by. None yet in Iraq and Afghanistan. And Iran's mullah's don't seem to feel an urgent need to end the nuclear standoff. Seeking a new balance in America's dealings in the Middle East, Obama asked Israel to stop building settlements, but the building goes on. And the Chinese seem to understand his less than aggressive stance in pressing for human rights as a green light to change nothing. Even when the stakes were less than life and death ' his bid to bring the Olympics to Chicago ' he was denied. Not that any of this is easy. And it may be that some of these more serious challenges would by now be more difficult still if Obama had not set a new tone. But might the opposite be true? Might our adversaries see the president's coolness as uncertainty and his deliberativeness as weakness? Can they exploit his affinity for common ground, by pushing to gain more ground for themselves? By acknowledging that all sides can have legitimate interests, as well as legitimate grievances, is the president yielding the high ground? Most importantly, are we safer now that we are living in the era of president number 44? It comes down to being respected, which is not the same as being liked. Americans have always aspired to have it both ways. Machiavelli would have us choose.View Debate Page
- From The Panel
- For the Motion
- Against the Motion
- Obama's Policy is Evolving
- Obama's Foreign Policy
- Obama's Leadership Style
- Foreign Policy in the Middle East
- Foreign Policy in Iran
- Foreign Policy in Israel
- Miscalculations in U.S. Afghan Offensive
- Foreign Policy in Pakistan
- Foreign Policy in Iraq
- Nuclear Strategy
- Foreign Policy in Russia
- Foreign Policy in Asia
- Foreign Policy in China
- Foreign Policy in India
- Foreign Policy in North Korea
- Founding Partner, Rosemont Capital
Dan Senor and Christian Whiton, TIME, June 20, 2009
Dan Senor and Christian Whiton, Wall Street Journal, June 17, 2009
Dan Senor and Peter Wehner, Wall Street Journal, September 3, 2009
Dan Senor, Wall Street Journal, July 21, 2009
- Chairman and Editor-in-Chief of U.S. News & World Report
Mortimer Zuckerman, Wall Street Journal Europe, April 28, 2010
Mortimer Zuckerman, April 2, 2010
It is the president's job to offer a coherent program for the twin threats of a static economy and an unsustainable explosion of our debts and deficits.
To climb out of the fiscal hole, there must be hard compromises from everyone on the political spectrum. Conservatives will have to accept tax increases and defense cuts, and liberals will have to accept the reduction of entitlement benefits.
- Four-Star General as NATOâs Supreme Allied Commander, Europe.
With a brutal dictator like Mr. Assad, only the knowledge that he cannot prevail will force him to negotiate an exit.
- French Philosopher & Journalist
How does America look to foreign eyes? This year marks the bicentennial of the birth of Alexis de Tocqueville, our keenest interpreter. We asked another Frenchman to travel deep into America and report on what he found.
Leaving the Paris Agreement is like Brexit: It’ll take years. The rest of Trump’s term, at least. And because the climate revolution is supposed to unfold over the very long term, it is possible that the American president may simply not have enough time to sabotage the process or crush the spirit kindled in Paris two years go.
It all begins now — if, in fact, this terrible crisis has served to reveal not just the economic but also the political, moral, and spiritual bankruptcy with which we have just had such a close brush, and if we know how to respond to it, above and beyond the Greek case, with real acts of recommitment and reform.
France must now recall these great moments in its republican tradition and hold them up as a model for today’s leaders. For what will be needed to hold the territory that the republic nearly lost to the FN is political courage of a sort that, for the moment, is in short supply.
What a pity if, after standing so courageously against an outside enemy, France were to yield to an inner enemy that dreams, in its way, of bringing the nation to its knees.
The French philosopher talks about his new film, Peshmerga, which follows the Kurds fighting Isis, and gives his thoughts on Brexit and the crisis of democracy.
Liberalism is embattled, says the French author and intellectual. As France faces its election year and the rise of the Front National, he argues that liberal politics have helped bring about their own crisis. But should liberals embrace the bans of the Hijab? And how should they respond to Vladimir Putin’s autocracy?
Politics is a noble, brave world, says Bernard-Henri Lévy – but that's not what we have here. Levy's latest book is "The Genius of Judaism".
As the French election heats up, Evan Davis speaks to renowned philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy about the rise of populism and the global march to the right.
For the Motion
The new liberalism and the end of American ascendancy.