Suggest a topic at iq2usinfo@iq2us.org
or visit our Contact Page
Login or register and
join the conversation.
Sort comments by
Newest
Upvotes
IQ2
3

Edgar Mkhitaryan
4 October 2020 - 09:49 AM
After watching the debate, I decided to vote ‘undecided’ as the motion, not its counter-motion is explicit about concrete policy action. That said, I fully support the specific countering point…
Read more
IQ2
3

Les Kuzyk
5 July 2019 - 18:44 PM
Tambora: The Eruption that Changed the World, an excellent historical review of a natural volcano that cooled the planet, on a very scant available scenario. https://press.princeton.edu/titles/10195.html
Read more
IQ2
3

Les Kuzyk
5 July 2019 - 18:37 PM
Repetition that the idea is theoretical does not hold. Pinatubo blew 8 million tons of SO2 into the stratosphere in 1991, and the climate impact was studied.
Read more
IQ2
3

Les Kuzyk
5 July 2019 - 17:02 PM
After over a decade of research on climate, and potential action, I conclude that human nature requires an understandable crisis to trigger a response. I propose in novel form a…
Read more
IQ2
3

Les Kuzyk
5 July 2019 - 16:47 PM
After publishing two academic papers, and noting no change, I began a researched speculation climate novel series, with a SRM geoengineering theme. David Keith is my primary research source. Pinatubo…
Read more
IQ2
3

James Mason
1 May 2019 - 20:27 PM
Minor modification: the for side did argue against even doing research because even that might persuade some people that we don't need to do anything else or worse, let opportunists…
Read more
IQ2
3

James Mason
1 May 2019 - 20:23 PM
Wow. Undecided to against. Beforehand, I thought this motion was really poorly posed and couldn't decide which way to vote even after reading the summary arguments. What does "crazy" mean…
Read more
IQ2
3

Fred Melden
24 April 2019 - 20:42 PM
The proposition is flawed. It favors a result that aligns with the conservative/corporate point of view. They could have made the proposition: “Geo-engineering is a bad idea for addressing climmate…
Read more
IQ2
3

james pruett
23 April 2019 - 12:55 PM
are solutions to that being debated here?
IQ2
3

Vincent Mako
19 April 2019 - 20:07 PM
The core problem is not emissions. The absolute number of people is the core problem.
Read more
IQ2
3

Hua Zhang
19 April 2019 - 01:24 AM
I still think Engineering solar radiation is a crazy idea, but after debate I voted "no" to the motion. It is because the aganist side phased it as a simple…
Read more
IQ2
3

Stepheny Echevarria
19 April 2019 - 00:02 AM
But what’s important is that he believes that it’s not the only step to be put into practice. There are multiple key factors to properly move forward towards regulating the…
Read more
IQ2
3

Stepheny Echevarria
18 April 2019 - 23:58 PM
Yes, I am now. Thank you
IQ2
3

Laura Pritchard
18 April 2019 - 23:42 PM
But the argument of the fear of control and misuse is very strong.
Read more
IQ2
3

Laura Pritchard
18 April 2019 - 23:40 PM
Very interesting argument by David Keith, under the circumstances of the statement being debated.
Read more
IQ2
3

Connor Curfman
18 April 2019 - 23:24 PM
Are you able to see the livestream?
IQ2
3

Connor Curfman
18 April 2019 - 23:23 PM
Stepheny, are you seeing the livestream?
IQ2
3

Viswamohanan viswam
18 April 2019 - 23:04 PM
unable to see the live cast
IQ2
3

Stepheny Echevarria
18 April 2019 - 23:03 PM
Hello, is this going to start? Lol
IQ2
3

Matthias Honegger
18 April 2019 - 08:53 AM
I vote ‘undecided’ as the motion not its counter motion is explicit about concrete policy action. That said, I fully support the specific countering point that expresses the sentiment that…
Read more
IQ2
3

Vincent Mako
17 April 2019 - 23:57 PM
Global warming caused by human activity likely has more negative than positive impacts on human lifestyles. However, there are and will be people who benefit from: longer growing seasons, changing…
Read more
IQ2
3

Vincent Mako
17 April 2019 - 23:55 PM
Global warming caused by human activity likely has more negative than positive impacts on human lifestyles. However, there are and will be people who benefit from: longer growing seasons, changing…
Read more
IQ2
3

Larry Kennedy 1
17 April 2019 - 21:55 PM
These particles will be naturally removed in a few years, same as those from volcanoes.
Read more
IQ2
3

Jeremy Anderson
20 March 2019 - 15:31 PM
First question - can we easily recover the reflective particles if it turns out to be undesireabke to have them in our atmosphere or orbiting the planet. If so then…
Read more