Suggest a topic at iq2usinfo@iq2us.org or visit our Contact Page
Login or register and
join the conversation.
Sort comments by
Newest
Upvotes
IQ2
3

Jeremy Anderson
11 August 2017 - 19:42 PM
1
Predebate. Talk about hitting em right between the eyes. This topic is actually more important than you might think. Boiled down, this is a debate about whether or not people…
Read more
IQ2
3

Matt Chalawsky
28 December 2016 - 20:04 PM
There needs to be a balance between valuable information and privacy. Everything is not news worthy. If something shows up only for your name, you should have some mechanism to…
Read more
IQ2
3

23 May 2016 - 00:37 AM
On 2016-05-22 20:37:33, Tom Graham wrote:The news gets to report on pretty much anything, and the freedom of speech is of the utmost importance. However, young people make mistakes and…
Read more
IQ2
3

11 April 2016 - 17:22 PM
If it becomes even remotely achievable we live way into ours 100s, the powers that be will want to dictate who lives and who doesn't because our species like to…
Read more
IQ2
3

6 November 2015 - 02:04 AM
On 2015-11-05 21:04:32, Witcher wrote:I believe that the right to be forgotten should be allowed. The reason I believe this is be added because when someone doesn't want their face…
Read more
IQ2
3

15 June 2015 - 10:46 AM
On 2015-06-15 06:46:07, Keser S wrote:Eric Posner referred to a tort in U.S. law protecting the right to privacy. It should be noted that this tort (of public disclosure of…
Read more
IQ2
3

31 March 2015 - 13:14 PM
On 2015-03-31 09:14:06, Alex wrote:@kristen indallas I think you misunderstood what was being said about relevance to the public. "All the rhetoric about things "in the public interest" being exempt…
Read more
IQ2
3

27 March 2015 - 07:31 AM
On 2015-03-27 03:31:46, Marna Anning wrote:This is ridiculous. Slowly eroding our privacy rights. The people against the motion focused solely on semantics not on the focal issue: privacy. Privacy for…
Read more
IQ2
3

25 March 2015 - 23:52 PM
I lean towards the for side but the against side were definitely the better debaters. They kept the for side on the defensive by redefining the debate towards censorship and…
Read more
IQ2
3

24 March 2015 - 00:39 AM
On 2015-03-23 20:39:31, kristen inDallas wrote:The pro side was actually what persuaded me to be against this. All the rhetoric about things "in the public interest" being exempt left me…
Read more
IQ2
3

18 March 2015 - 17:30 PM
On 2015-03-18 13:30:37, clarinette02 wrote:It is very unfortunate that the audience was misguided by the assumptions of censorship from Andrew McLaughlin. Jonathan Zirttrain was very clear to admit that the…
Read more
IQ2
3

18 March 2015 - 09:27 AM
On 2015-03-18 05:27:31, Kai Jones wrote:I feel that it should be online and accessable to the public indefinately. Employers and other sources have access to backround information to a persons…
Read more
IQ2
3

18 March 2015 - 03:55 AM
As William Ferrall points out, the Internet never truly forgets anything unless every last private copy of the information in question is hunted down, maybe by spyware, and erased. I…
Read more
IQ2
3

17 March 2015 - 22:55 PM
I am torn on this and I supposed it would have to do with details of how things are implemented. I don't really think I can make a decision on…
Read more
IQ2
3

12 March 2015 - 07:30 AM
On 2015-03-12 03:30:28, Bob Bolton wrote:I actually wrote a law review article on this very subject (I mostly took the negative side). Might be of some slight interest to some.…
Read more
IQ2
3

12 March 2015 - 04:28 AM
Superb debate.I think the proposers of the motion lost because they did not provide reassuring answers to challenges laid out by the opposition, specifically regarding the issue of who does…
Read more
IQ2
3

11 March 2015 - 19:34 PM
On 2015-03-11 15:34:44, Rebentisch wrote:It is a misleading claim that "In 2014, the European Union’s Court of Justice determined that individuals have a right to be forgotten". In fact the…
Read more
IQ2
3

10 March 2015 - 21:01 PM
Like most things there is a balance that needs to be maintained! Unfortunately there are those with more aggressive tendencies who will violate and abuse the system! They will always…
Read more
IQ2
3

10 March 2015 - 19:49 PM
On 2015-03-10 15:49:06, Matthew Horan wrote:Should Facebook have the right to remove beheading videos posted by a user after complaints have been made?
Read more
IQ2
3

7 March 2015 - 20:38 PM
Why do you want to be forgotten online? Surveillance and its abuse. Can ‘net anonymity be guaranteed? No. This relates to the basic functioning of digital machinery. Any software safeguard…
Read more
IQ2
3

7 March 2015 - 11:07 AM
On 2015-03-07 06:07:21, P B wrote:Obviously information that is part of the public record cannot and should not be tampered with. It's when corporations like Google and YouTube are able…
Read more
IQ2
3

2 March 2015 - 00:53 AM
The problem with search companies being forced to remove links to information that is 'irrelevant or no longer relevant' is the question of who gets to decide what information is…
Read more
IQ2
3

18 February 2015 - 02:10 AM
On 2015-02-17 21:10:08, Dan Bednarik wrote:The internet has crossed lines of privacy and wrongfully denies the ability of someone who has served a penalty, even when they were not guilty…
Read more