User login

Join The Debate

Cast your vote and join the conversation.

Membership is free.

Get Started

You are here


We Should Accept Performance-Enhancing Drugs in Competitive Sports

Back To Debate
Download Transcript
Live Transcript

Debate Details

As performance-enhancing drugs become more prevalent in competitive sports, opponents are crying foul. They argue that athletes gain an unnatural, and unfair, advantage over their competitors by using drugs, and that widespread use is likely to pressure all players into taking them just to stay in the game. But as society is increasingly invested in personal enhancers and sports become more technologically advanced, is drugging in sports all that bad? 

The Debaters

For the motion

Radley Balko

Senior Editor and Investigative Journalist for Reason magazine

Previously, Balko was a policy analyst for the Cato Institute specializing in civil liberties issues, where he published a paper on alcohol policy... Read More

Norman Fost

M.D., M.P.H., a Professor of Pediatrics and Bioethics at the University of Wisconsin, and Director of the Bioethics Program

Fost founded the Bioethics Program at the University of Wisconsin in 1973. He has published widely on ethical and legal issues in health care, and... Read More

Julian Savulescu

Uehiro Professor of Practical Ethics at the University of Oxford

Julian is director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics and of the Program on Ethics and Biosciences in the James Martin 21st Century... Read More

Against the motion

George Michael

Legendary Sportscaster

George pioneered the sports highlight shows that fill the airwaves today. He was the creator and host of the nationally syndicated Sports Machine... Read More

Dale Murphy

Former Major League Baseball Outfielder and Catcher

Dale was a seven-time All-Star, five-time Golden Glove winner and two-time National League MVP with the Atlanta Braves. He started the iWon’t Cheat... Read More

Richard Pound

Chairman of the World Anti-Doping Agency and a Partner in the Canadian Law Firm, Stikeman Elliott

Richard has been named to Time magazine's 100 most influential people in the world for his relentless efforts to rid sport of performance-enhancing... Read More

Where Do You Stand?

For The Motion
  • Innovation in sports, such as new technology and medically based training techniques, should be welcomed, not stifled.
  • Steroids are used in various medical treatments and other enhancers, such as alcohol and caffeine, are used in daily life without recourse; athletes shouldn’t be subject to regulations not otherwise imposed on the general public.
  • Professional sports are inherently dangerous as competitive athletes push their bodies to the limit; steroid use is no different.
  • Prohibiting performance-enhancing drugs causes more harm to athletes, as it forces athletes to take drugs in secret and ensures that these drugs are not regulated. 
Against The Motion
  • Performance-enhancing drugs give using athletes an unfair and unnatural advantage over their competitors.
  • If performance-enhancing drugs are not banned, athletes will be compelled to sacrifice their immediate and long-term health to remain competitive throughout their often short-lived careers.
  • If permitted by professional athletic leagues, young and aspiring athletes would be pressured to take drugs, therefore compromising their health and wellbeing.
  • Steroids and other drugs compromise the integrity of competitive sport as a whole; they eliminate the element of natural competition and tarnish the tradition of sport as a wholesome cultural pastime.

This vote is intended to capture your opinions before hearing tonight’s debate.

Cast Your Vote

This vote is intended to capture your opinions after hearing tonight’s debate.

Cast Your Vote

Before you cast your vote, share some information with us:

{{ errors.first('email') }}

{{ errors.first('first name') }}

{{ errors.first('last name') }}

Are you sure?

{{ currentQuestion }} of {{ questions.length }}

Are you sure?

Are you sure?

{{ currentQuestion }} of {{ questions.length }}

Are you sure?

Review your answers below:

: {{ preVote[i] }}

Review your answers below:

: {{ postVote[i] }}

Please enjoy the debate and come back afterwards to cast your Post-Debate vote

Tell Us More

Before you cast your final vote, please tell us how you watched the debate

I listened to the podcast or read the transcript.
I watched it online.
I attended the debate live.
I haven't seen it yet.

Tell us why you changed your mind:

For the Motion Against the Motion Undecided
For the Motion Against the Motion Undecided

: {{ preVote[i] }}

: {{ postVote[i] }}

Donate to IQ2US

Thank you for joining us! Enter your email address below to receive the post-debate analysis and debate updates from IQ2US.

Learn About Voting
IQ2US debates are designed to expose audiences to civilized debate featuring opposing points of view. Please vote with your most genuine opinion.


  • Live Audience
  • Online Audience
  • Results
  • Breakdown
Please choose what best describes why this comment is being flagged:

The Discussion

or and Join the Conversation
Load More Comments