Neal Katyal & Prof. John Harrison Debate At The 11th Annual Rosenkranz Debate - Open to Debate

aviator 1 win 1win aviator pinup india lucky jet crash pin-up 4rabet india 1 win lucky jet x 1win sayti 4era bet pin up casino online mosbet pinup pin up casino one win game lucky jet pin up 1win 1win online 1win aposta 4rabet mosbet casino parimatch 4rabet bangladesh mostbet aviator login parimatch mostbet casino pin up mostbet az mostbet aviator pinup mostbet kz 1 win 1win slot mostbet casino mostbet pin up 777 1 win mosbet india pin up 1win aviator mostbet aviator 1 win 1win yüklə 1 win az aviator lacky jet mostbet casino lucky jet mosbet aviator mostbet india

Register Login

Debates
- Features
- Topics
  Upcoming debates
- Close ✕
  - Ban the Box:…
    
    1 in 3 adults in the United States have a criminal record, which offers significant challenges to these individuals, including reentering the job market after incarceration. Over the years, there’s been a push for “Ban the Box” policies that call for removing questions asking about criminal history on job applications to give former offenders a fair chance by delaying background checks until later in the hiring process. Those who are against early screening argue that former offenders shouldn’t continue to be punished by the system, especially when it disproportionally affects minorities. It also prevents applicants from contributing and reintegrating into society and reducing dependency on social services. Those who disagree and say that screening a job applicant’s criminal history is important, argue that employers have a responsibility to ensure the safety of their business, employees, and customers and make informed hiring decisions. Without early screening, some recent studies show that employers might unconsciously resort to biased assumptions or stereotypes when evaluating candidates. With this context, we debate Ban the Box: Should We Banish the Criminal History Check Box from Job Applications?
    
    Friday, April 19, 2024
Insights
About
- - Become a Member
  - Newsletter
- Close ✕
  
  SUPPORT OPEN-MINDED DEBATE
  
  Help us bring debate to communities and classrooms across the nation.
  Donate
Header Bottom
- Become a member Newsletter Donate

Become a member Donate

16 November, 2018

Neal Katyal & Prof. John Harrison Debate At The 11th Annual Rosenkranz Debate

DC Capital Building Refelction

RESOLVED: District courts do not have the authority to enter universal injunctions.

Prof. John Harrison, James Madison Distinguished Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law
Mr. Neal Katyal, Partner, Hogan Lovells US LLP
Moderator: Hon. Beth A. Williams, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Policy, United States Department of Justice

READ NEXT

Newsletter: Should Congress Stop Funding the War in Ukraine?

This week: New episode: Should Congress authorize more money to help Ukraine fight Russia? A closer look at how aid to Ukraine compares to other U.S. spending Your Sunday reading list In step…

April 15, 2024

Newsletter: Is Religion a Force for Good?

ARGUING YES Shadi Hamid Columnist and Editorial Board Member of The Washington Post; Assistant Research Professor of Islamic Studies at Fuller Seminary ARGUING NO Annie Laurie Gaylor Co-Founder and Co-President of the Freedom From…

April 5, 2024

Childhood Obesity Guidelines Newsletter: Good Medicine or Too Extreme?

ARGUING “GOOD MEDICINE” Dr. Julia Nordgren Pediatric Lipid Specialist at Palo Alto Medical Foundation; Attending Physician at the Stanford Weight Clinic ARGUING “TOO EXTREME” Dr. Janna Gewirtz O'Brien Pediatrician and Assistant Professor at the…

April 1, 2024

Revisiting the Debate: Should TikTok Be Banned in the U.S.?

ARGUING YES Kori Schake Senior Fellow and Director of Foreign and Defense Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute ARGUING NO Milton Mueller Professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology School of Public Policy;…

March 22, 2024

Newsletter: Does Taylor Swift Deserve Her Billion Dollar Fortune?

ARGUING YES Jessica Flanigan Political Philosopher and Chair in Ethics and Democratic Values at the University of Richmond ARGUING NO Ingrid Robeyns Chair in Ethics of Institutions at Utrecht University's Ethics Institute; Author of…

March 18, 2024

Newsletter: Should We Address the Gender Wage Gap?

ARGUING YES Kadie Ward Chief Administrative Officer and Commissioner at the Pay Equity Commission of Ontario ARGUING NO Allison Schrager Economist; Bloomberg Opinion Contributor; Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute GUEST MODERATOR Nayeema…

March 11, 2024

Newsletter: Has Citizens United Undermined Democracy?

ARGUING YES Francesca Procaccini Assistant Professor of Law at Vanderbilt University Law School ARGUING YES Ciara Torres-Spelliscy Professor of Law at Stetson University ARGUING NO Floyd Abrams Senior Counsel at Cahill Gordon &…

March 5, 2024

Newsletter on Color Blindness

ARGUING YES Jamelle Bouie Columnist for The New York Times ARGUING NO Coleman Hughes Host of the “Conversations with Coleman” podcast, Contributing Writer at The Free Press, and Analyst at CNN …

February 26, 2024

Unresolved: The Iran Threat

Ray Takeyh Senior Fellow for Middle East Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations Barbara Slavin Distinguished Fellow at the Stimson Center Michael Doran Senior Fellow and Director of the Center for Peace…

February 20, 2024

Newsletter: Esther Perel on Resolving Conflict in Relationships

Esther Perel Psychotherapist, New York Times Bestselling Author, and Host of the “Where Should We Begin?” Podcast John Donvan Host and Moderator-in-Chief This week: New episode: Esther Perel on how to disagree…

February 12, 2024

A Debate Dividing Republicans: Two Conservatives on One Big Spending Problem

ARGUING YES Oren Cass Executive Director of American Compass ARGUING NO David McIntosh President of the Club for Growth GUEST MODERATOR Nayeema Raza Journalist at New York Magazine and Vox This…

February 5, 2024

Newsletter: Is Engineering Solar Radiation a Crazy Idea?

ARGUING YES Clive Hamilton Professor; Author of "Earthmasters: The Dawn of the Age of Climate Engineering" ARGUING YES Anjali Viswamohanan Director of Policy at the Asia Investor Group on Climate Change ARGUING NO…

January 29, 2024

MOST READ

Open to Debate Conversation: A New University Offers "Forbidden" Courses

They say that colleges have become too censorious. That our most prestigious institutions have abandoned their mission of fostering critical minds and sparking thoughtful dissent. And that a generation of American students is missing out.…

January 7, 2022

Agree To Disagree COVID Series

Covid is the pandemic threatening our world right now. But the pandemic of misinformation is proving similarly disastrous. Open to Debate brings you “Agree to Disagree: COVID Series,” answering the important questions about the disease…

December 16, 2021

New Podcast: The State Of Debate On Capitol Hill And The American Health Care Act

In this special edition of Open to Debate podcast, we are taking a moment to explore how debates really work in Congress, and to get an insider's perspective on how it has been changing over…

June 27, 2017

Legalize Psychedelics? The Results Are In.

First off, we at Open to Debate would like to extend a warm thank you to all of those who attended and cast their votes during the premier and nationwide broadcasts of our most recent…

April 30, 2021

RESULTS: We Should Expand The Supreme Court

After keeping the vote open for 7 days, the results are in. The team arguing against the motion “We Should Expand The Supreme Court” has emerged as the clear winner. Congratulations to Akhil Reed Amar,…

October 8, 2021

Open To Debate Wins Five Telly Awards

Open to Debate U.S. Wins Record Five Telly Broadcast Awards At the 42nd Annual Telly Awards honoring excellence in video and television across all screens, Open to Debate won five different awards - a personal…

May 27, 2021

The Intelligence Briefing: ‘Twas The Sunday After Christmas

...and all through the House, attention was focused on what Georgia’s voters would espouse. A run-off election to control the other chamber, in a contest that could pit neighbor versus neighbor. Meanwhile, vaccinations continued to…

December 28, 2020

Intelligence Briefing: The Electoral College

This week, the Supreme Court heard arguments (over teleconference) on a case that gets to the heart of a truly unique feature in American democracy: The Electoral College. In this faithless elector case, a group…

March 23, 2022

UP FOR DEBATE: Do Identity Politics Win?

In this week's briefing, we dive into identity politics, break down the GOP’s attraction with African Americans, examine why how we count is before SCOTUS, and of course bring you your Sunday reading list. Enjoy.…

December 14, 2020

20 Books To Raise Your IQ This Summer: Our 2020 Summer Reading List

How can you stay sharp this summer? In true Open to Debate fashion, we’re challenging you – our community–to take on a summer reading list with a purpose: bringingnew perspectives to your bookcase. We curated…

June 30, 2020

The Year In Review: The Best Debate Moments Of 2022

2022 has finally ended. Some of it bad, some of it splendid. There was Russia’s invasion. And Ukraine’s self-defense. The west lobbed isolation against Moscow’s offense. This was also the year America closed the door despite…

December 22, 2022

2020 - Year In Review

Looking back at 2020, its been interesting. Open to Debate, like the rest of the world, went virtual as a result of a covid-19 pandemic that upended business models and accelerated trends far beyond…

December 26, 2020

DEBATE COMMUNITY

Join a community of social and intellectual leaders that truly value the free exchange of ideas.

BECOME A MEMBER

EDUCATIONAL BRIEFS

Readings on our weekly debates, debater editorials, and news on issues that affect our everyday lives.

NEWSLETTER

SUPPORT OPEN-MINDED DEBATE

Help us bring debate to communities and classrooms across the nation.

DONATE

Sign Up / Log In

@ 2006-2024, Open to Debate Foundation, All rights reserved