George Washington warned us…
Political parties. The choices are limited. Winner-take-all voting is hard on those who don’t wear red or blue. And in 2020, third-party contenders for the White House may be even less of a factor. Sorry, Kanye.
So … in this final leg of the U.S. presidential campaign, we’re taking a step back to ask a bigger question: Is a two-party system actually good for the country?
George Washington generally wasn’t a fan, using his farewell address to warn that the “will of a party” might supplant the “will of the nation.” Yet Thomas Jefferson later concluded that “men by their constitutions are naturally divided into two parties.’’
That usually means there’s more to it than you might think. And after watching this, you may even change your mind. Yascha Mounk and Norm Ornstein square off against Lee Drutman and Katherine Gehl, with a little history from Joanne B. Freeman to start us off.
Of course, we, at Intelligence Squared, respectfully disagree. Have a look at our latest Unresolved debate series on American Policing to get a sense of how we do it.
P.S. - Sign up here to find us in your inbox each week. And if you like what you read, consider sharing this blog post with a friend here. You can always reach us at email@example.com with ideas and feedback.
POINT / COUNTERPOINT
Two perspectives on one of the nation's biggest debates this week.
Should the U.S. Embrace Third Parties
When one number tells two stories.
The number of countries with mandatory voting laws
Roughly four-in-ten eligible Americans did not vote in the 2016 presidential election. While most of the world does not have compulsory voting, some countries, like Belgium and Australia, do. Should the U.S. make voting mandatory?
POINTS OF VIEW
Top insights and news from the intellectual leaders
who have battled it out on the Intelligence Squared stage.
- Meanwhile, Sally Pipes argues that the ACA is failing Americans, noting that unsubsidized enrollment in the marketplace has fallen in recent years. [Read more via Fox, Sally's debate on Medicare for All.]