Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death sent shockwaves around the nation. This week, we look at the unfolding debates around the Supreme Court, the legal system, and the looming election. Let’s dive in:
Here’s what we have in store:
- That's Debatable: Should the Senate Fill the Vacant Supreme Court Seat?
- Intelligraphic: Sizing Up the Bench
- Double Digits: 2%
- Points of View: Insights and analysis from past debaters
Sign up here to find us in your inbox each week and if you like what you read, consider sharing our newsletter with a friend here. You can always reach us at email@example.com with ideas and feedback.
Two perspectives on one of the nation's biggest debates this week.
Should the Senate Fill the Supreme Court Vacancy?
It’s the question that will shape American law for decades to come: Who should be the next Supreme Court justice? With only weeks until the 2020 election, some argue that lawmakers should follow the precedent set in 2016 and wait to hold nomination hearings. Rushing through a contentious confirmation process, they say, would only deepen partisan divisions, call the legitimacy of the court into question, and threaten confidence in our democracy. But others say the Senate has a constitutional obligation to consider judicial nominees and that, given the possibility of a contested election, the Supreme Court must have a full bench to avoid a possible 4-4 split decision on cases involving voting. Should the current Senate confirm a new justice now?
How many justices sit on the Supreme Court? Since 1869, the number has stayed steady at nine. But before that, Congress often changed the size of the court for its own political aims. Should lawmakers consider expanding the bench once again?
Is it time to reevaluate the number of Supreme Justices?
When one number tells two stories.
The percent of federal criminal defendants who go to trial.
Most federal criminal defendants – some 90 percent – plead guilty rather than going to trial in 2018, with the remaining 8 percent having their cases dismissed. What does this say about the criminal justice system today? Do prosecutors abuse their power through excessive plea bargaining? Or is this an efficient and effective means of ensuring justice?
POINTS OF VIEW
Top insights and news from the intellectual leaders
who have battled it out on the Intelligence Squared stage.
Next week, we’ll host an evening of debate on the topic of police reform. John Donvan joins five esteemed guests to debate police unions, training standards, and calls to “defund” police in America. Get a sneak preview of our debaters’ arguments here and tune in next Wednesday evening to watch the full debate premiere
- Paul Butler argues that the FOP, the nation’s largest police organization, should be relegated to the dustbin of history. [Read more via the Nation]
- Jason Johnson says that police critics and supporters can find common ground on at least one thing: the police have too many duties. [Read more via USA Today]
- Rafael Mangual writes that reducing the police presence in New York City is making citizens less safe.[Read more via NY Post]
- Sherrif Sue Rahr seeks to reimagine the way police do their jobs. [Read more via Time]
- Vikrant Reddy weighs in on America's shifting attitudes toward zero-tolerance policing. [Read more via NPR]