Jake Sullivan - Open to Debate

aviator 1 win 1win aviator pinup india lucky jet crash pin-up 4rabet india 1 win lucky jet x 1win sayti 4era bet pin up casino online mosbet pinup pin up casino one win game lucky jet pin up 1win 1win online 1win aposta 4rabet mosbet casino parimatch 4rabet bangladesh mostbet aviator login parimatch mostbet casino pin up mostbet az mostbet aviator pinup mostbet kz 1 win 1win slot mostbet casino mostbet pin up 777 1 win mosbet india pin up 1win aviator mostbet aviator 1 win 1win yüklə 1 win az aviator lacky jet mostbet casino lucky jet mosbet aviator mostbet india

Register Login

Debates
- Features
- Topics
  Upcoming debates
- Close ✕
  - Ban the Box:…
    
    1 in 3 adults in the United States have a criminal record, which offers significant challenges to these individuals, including reentering the job market after incarceration. Over the years, there’s been a push for “Ban the Box” policies that call for removing questions asking about criminal history on job applications to give former offenders a fair chance by delaying background checks until later in the hiring process. Those who are against early screening argue that former offenders shouldn’t continue to be punished by the system, especially when it disproportionally affects minorities. It also prevents applicants from contributing and reintegrating into society and reducing dependency on social services. Those who disagree and say that screening a job applicant’s criminal history is important, argue that employers have a responsibility to ensure the safety of their business, employees, and customers and make informed hiring decisions. Without early screening, some recent studies show that employers might unconsciously resort to biased assumptions or stereotypes when evaluating candidates. With this context, we debate Ban the Box: Should We Banish the Criminal History Check Box from Job Applications?
    
    Friday, April 19, 2024
Insights
About
- - Become a Member
  - Newsletter
- Close ✕
  
  SUPPORT OPEN-MINDED DEBATE
  
  Help us bring debate to communities and classrooms across the nation.
  Donate
Header Bottom
- Become a member Newsletter Donate

Become a member Donate

Jake Sullivan

Former National Security Adviser to Vice President Joe Biden

Jake Sullivan is a Montgomery fellow at Dartmouth College, a Martin R. Flug visiting lecturer at Yale Law School, and a nonresident senior fellow in the Geoeconomics and Strategy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Previously, he served in the Obama administration as national security adviser to Vice President Joe Biden and director of policy planning at the State Department, as well as deputy chief of staff to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Sullivan was also the senior policy adviser on Secretary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Debates Featuring Jake Sullivan

The Recent U.S. Policy Towards China Is Productive

With Graham Allison, Michael Pillsbury, Kori Schake, Jake Sullivan
August 2, 2019

The United States is cracking down on China in an attempt to create a more favorable balance of trade. Other concerns include continuing Chinese thefts of intellectual property and the imposition of technology transfer requirements to do business in China. The U.S. seeks to frustrate China’s program to achieve dominance in a range of advanced technologies. And it wants to cripple Huawei, the telecoms giant, which it sees as a potential security threat. Both parties have instituted punitive tariffs, and both are feeling…

The Recent U.S. Policy Towards China Is Productive

The United States is cracking down on China in an attempt to create a more favorable balance of trade. Other concerns include continuing Chinese thefts of intellectual property and the imposition of technology transfer requirements to do business…

With Graham Allison, Michael Pillsbury, Kori Schake, Jake Sullivan
August 2, 2019

Sign Up / Log In

@ 2006-2024, Open to Debate Foundation, All rights reserved